Author Topic: Not Exactly a pellet Review  (Read 8563 times)

Offline longislandhunter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8204
    • http://
RE: Not Exactly a pellet Review
« Reply #15 on: July 29, 2007, 02:10:17 PM »
Those JSB's certainly are good pellets, and I have a good supply of them just for that reason, but I also get excellent results with the CPL's in most of my rifles.  I guess it just depends on what your rifle likes or dislikes.  

Jeff
\"If it was easy it wouldn\'t be hunting, it would be shopping.\"

Offline r1derbike

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 457
    • http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v402/r1derbike/
Re: Not Exactly a pellet Review
« Reply #16 on: September 17, 2007, 03:33:05 PM »
I've always been PO'd that the number of deformed pellets in ALL brands I've used is too high.  So bad, manufacturers should start a recycle operation for the bad ones.  I know shipping/handling causes lots of this, but the makers could do a better job of packing pellets, than just throwing a wad of them loosely in a tin.

I love airgunning, but pellet sorting has become a real PITA lately...there, I feel better!

We pay a load of cash for our "adult" air guns, the ammo should be just as high-quality.

Charles
Lead Launchers: 30 Year Old Daisy .177 Cal. Model 880 Pumper (BSA 3022SB Red Dot Scope), Gamo CFX .22 Cal. Springer with GRT III Trigger (BSA 4X32 Scope), Gamo CFX .177 Cal. Combo Springer (BSA 2-7X32 AO Scope), Gamo R-77 .177 Cal. CO2 Combat Pistol (Laser Sight), Umarex/Beretta .177 Cal. CX4 Storm CO2 Bullpup (Walther PS-22 Red Dot Scope & Dorcy Night Light), Chinese QB-57 .22 Cal. Takedown Springer (BSA 3022SB Red Dot Scope & Dorcy Night Light),  Chinese Tech-Force S2-1 .177 Cal. Springer Pistol (Boat Anchor...), Chinese Tech-Force Contender Model 89 .22 Cal. Springer (BSA Laser & Tactical Light, CenterPoint 4-16X40 Illum. Ret. Mil. Dot Scope), Crosman 1377 .177 Cal. Pumper Pistol (1399 stock, BSA 3022SB Red Dot Scope), Daisy Powerline 717 .177 Cal. Single-Pump Pistol (Open Sights).